Topic: Name collision resolution
I have three wishes in the area of the name collision resolution...
A) I am using %ncs{1}. Is it possible to avoid the underline at the beginning?
B) Is it possible to use something I would call "alpha increment", for example:
NOW:
_01 _02 ... _09 _10 _11 ...
WISH, for instance %nca{2}:
aa ab ... az ba bb ...
C) This could be the most difficult to achieve, because it defers from your "philosophy", I think... Currently, I think that "collision" is the collision between the current set of selected calculated names. I think that more correct would perhaps be, if it would be the collision with real files, that exist at calculation time. So, after the first calculation of the new name, to look in the file system if it already exists (and then, if %nc used, recalculate, look again in the file system,...).
I know - this is a major change, but I think it would be better.
Thank you for considering C and helping me to achieve A (or even B), if already possible.
Regards,
Borut
EDIT: C is even more difficult, because I think the logic would need to check against both the file system and other already calculated values and there is no collision only if both cases are OK.